QUOTE (Susan @ Jun 19 2005, 09:08 PM)
Mike... just curious as to what kind of kung fu experience you have...
Been practicing Tai Chi for about 10 years on and off. Other than that just the occasional work out with people from Lau Gar and/or Wing Chun.
There are so many styles of Kung Fu. But you don't need to be an expert to see that they can be quite different from each other, particularly in terms of power generation. Take Lau Gar as an example, its very similar to the traditional/sport Karate type arts really, the methods of power generation are essentially the same. Wing Chun, on the other hand, you can immediately see is quite different. Power generation is dependent largely on the spasmodic action of the muscles utilising the Wing Chun stance, as opposed to the hip twist of Lau Gar and Karate.
That's why I thought that Wing Chun would be a good complement to Karate, the methodology is so different there shouldn't really be problems getting confused between the two.
DiverDan said:
QUOTE
The instructor was quite insistant that Wing Chun was the only martial art that had no defensive holes to allow an attack, although the basic guard was very similiar to what I am used to.
Sounds a bit overly evangelical to me. That said, I think its fair to say that the focus on centreline, trapping and the two hands working together does reduce the number of 'defensive holes'.
Mike