Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: How many kata?
Karatedo forum > The Dojo > Kata
Pages: 1, 2
Sionnagh
I have swiped this topic from another forum....

How many kata is enough?
Should there be more than one kata per grade level to increase the number of kata people know?
Should there be fewer so that students can learn a kata properly before starting to learn the next?
Should there be a set of core 'required' kata and extra 'optional' kata so that people can choose and train in kata which suits their ability better instead of a 'one-size-fits-all-or-else' approach?

wink.gif
Mick
Nooms
How many kata?

I like the "optional" option.

[OK, biting my tongue now... the rave I could have about kata... I be good.]

I think that, at the very least, the patterns for other katas could be taught while we learn the finer points of our current grade kata. It provides variety at least! And it gives us the opportunity to learn cool moves from the higher grades when we get to see them do a kata for which we know the pattern, for when we actually have to learn that kata.
But I know not everybody likes kata, and some people find it extremely difficult to learn and/or remember. So they wouldn't like having to learn more than one kata at a time (what is WRONG with you people?! Joking!!!), and that is why the "optional" idea would be good for everyone.

Bearette

[ ... kata, kata, kata, gimme kata, kata, kata, and more kata ... OK, I good now.]
fang
how about we don't do any kata :thumbwink:.
Boz
QUOTE (fang @ Jan 4 2004, 09:57 AM)
how about we don't do any kata :thumbwink:.

Hi Fang,

Seiously, you are most likely practising karate now without kata. Think about it, how many moves from kata could you use effectively if you were attacked?

I bet none.

All of those karate styles that don't teach effective techniques from kata are really only teaching a gymnastic routine, a martial dance!

The sad part is they keep telling each other how many kata they 'know' when the poor buggers don't know any really.

Comments?

Nice topic Mick wink.gif
russkris
More than one kata to a grade sound great. And the Idea of learning the finer point ot that kata before attempting the next kata sounds even better
Matt
Boz - intriguing, but before commenting can you clarify "effective techniques"
Do you mean just letting them go through the motions without any real focus, or are you refering to self defence applications?
Sionnagh
Well how many kumite drills do you do regularly, that students recognise the drill and know how to do it? Or the same for self-defence drills? And that you can then link into the relevant section of a particular kata?

wink.gif
Mick

Note: Boz posted the same opening question on another forum, I've just added some more questions...
Boz
QUOTE (Matt @ Jan 4 2004, 07:37 PM)
Boz - intriguing, but before commenting can you clarify "effective techniques".  Do you mean just letting them go through the motions without any real focus, or are you refering to self defence applications?

Kata comprise of effective (practical) techniques, physical exercise (training moves) and linking moves that may have application in their own right but are used in kata to link sequences together.

Kata contain ways to defend against being struck, escape from being seized, applying techniques of impact using various parts of the body from the toes to the head, and how to restrain or throw down.

The footwork in kata show how to enter an enemy's space or side step when necessary. Many counter and follow up techniques are implicit in kata after certain actions have been performed. These things cannot be learned by oneself.. they must be taught.

Regards,
Boz
fang
as i'v said many times before you want to learn how to defend yourself the best way is 5 to 6 step combos. learn how to change direction on the combs and they turn into 20 to 24 step combos, much like a kata but with real life meaning. kata is great to learn how to dance you are right there boz.
Brodius
Anything Fang says is bias. He hates kata, and should be pelted with rocks... again.

Anyway, there should be more kata. We shouldn't have to do Saifa twice or Bassai Dai twice. Getting to grade to Red belt simply because you 'know' the kata is stupid. The same goes for Green belt. You should have to know the kata perfectly to grade.
Sionnagh
Maybe fang would like a school where you learn, at most, 3 kata? Cos that's all you need if you learn them, not just learn how to do them. At least so I'm told, I have yet to reach that level of understanding of any kata.

wink.gif
Mick
Boz
QUOTE
Anything Fang says is bias. He hates kata, and should be pelted with rocks... again.


I don't think so.. he is being honest. Unless the purpose and intent of kata is taught alongside the moves then it is simply a martial dance. Way too many people practise kata with no idea of what it is they do. As an exercise routine it can be enjoyable but to the critical thinker with an analytical mind.. it is nonsense!


QUOTE
Anyway, there should be more kata. We shouldn't have to do Saifa twice or Bassai Dai twice. Getting to grade to Red belt simply because you 'know' the kata is stupid. The same goes for Green belt. You should have to know the kata perfectly to grade.


I'm sorry, I don't agree again. There is simply no benefit to knowing how to mimic your instructor and from memorizing a few dance routines. You don't know the kata until you can apply the moves sensibly.. IMO!

Regards,
Boz
Sionnagh
From the point of view of the student who attends a school where they simply learn the pattern and nothing more is required, more kata would seem appealing - seemingly more to learn. Where the only test of ability for grading purposes is how well they can dance out the kata form, the appeal of repetition of kata to this end soon palls.

However, if the system required the student to learn a kata, and demonstrate a sampling of applications I'm sure this would result in more interest in practicing a single kata, as preparation if for no other reason.

The next trick then though would be to avoid the potential trap of whichever application is taught by the instructor being seen as the only application.

But for any of this you'd need an instructor with the experience to be able to teach with this depth.

wink.gif
Mick
Brodius
QUOTE (Boz @ Jan 6 2004, 08:14 AM)
QUOTE
Anything Fang says is bias. He hates kata, and should be pelted with rocks... again.


I don't think so.. he is being honest. Unless the purpose and intent of kata is taught alongside the moves then it is simply a martial dance. Way too many people practise kata with no idea of what it is they do. As an exercise routine it can be enjoyable but to the critical thinker with an analytical mind.. it is nonsense!


QUOTE
Anyway, there should be more kata. We shouldn't have to do Saifa twice or Bassai Dai twice. Getting to grade to Red belt simply because you 'know' the kata is stupid. The same goes for Green belt. You should have to know the kata perfectly to grade.


I'm sorry, I don't agree again. There is simply no benefit to knowing how to mimic your instructor and from memorizing a few dance routines. You don't know the kata until you can apply the moves sensibly.. IMO!

Regards,
Boz

Sorry Boz, but I disagree. Kata is so much more than simple dance and exercise routines. Most of the moves I've learned in kata, I know will be useable in a real-life situation. Every so often kata is demonstrated with the help of a few senseis to show how each move actually works, what it's supposed to do, and what situation it can be used in. It's true that most of the kata we do is used on multiple assailants, but from just about every kata the idea of blocking an attack and then striking the assailant is there.

If you think that Go Kan Ryu kata is dancing, maybe you should head down to your local disco and see how it's really done. I doubt very much kata could flow as well when put up against techno funk beats. =O
deano
Seems to me Boz and Brodius are in agreement. smile.gif
Sionnagh
Thats great Brodius, as long as things like a push to the chest, grab of the shirt or collar (single or two hands), punch to the head, a choke, grab to the arm, headlock, strike or slash with a bottle or similar are all covered. If it's "attacker begins with x kick and follows with straight punch" then there may be application in kumite but not as likely in real life.

wink.gif
Mick
Thatmanwaters
Looking,listening,and learning. mellow.gif

In Tang soo do, the kids other style,we learn a new kata for each grade.The sensei appears to have very little time for Kata,as it is rarley practised(Iknow dojo for instruction, practise at home),her slant on this is that Kata has only a little benefit,in the sense that the multiple attacks and defence sonarios generally dont occur in the real world,and if they did,they would all attack together.
So when asked why? we do Kata in gradings,she said she is looking at stances (basics) used in conjunction with movement.
The self defence element is practised as a seperate issue.
So from these findings i can only see that Kata is a training tool.

Victoria does a creative form in Tang soo do , i asked a judge what he was looking for,when marking her.FLUIDITY of movement,STANCES, were the main answers.
I know that creative is not the same as normal Kata,but no one mentioned self defence applications,which is what i understood Kata to be about,defending yourself against numerous attacks.

Dont know if im right or wrong,but i am enjoying this post.
Thanks Mick, Boz. :thumbwink:
Boz
QUOTE (Brodius @ Jan 6 2004, 06:58 PM)
Sorry Boz, but I disagree. Kata is so much more than simple dance and exercise routines. Most of the moves I've learned in kata, I know will be useable in a real-life situation. Every so often kata is demonstrated with the help of a few senseis to show how each move actually works, what it's supposed to do, and what situation it can be used in. It's true that most of the kata we do is used on multiple assailants, but from just about every kata the idea of blocking an attack and then striking the assailant is there.

If you think that Go Kan Ryu kata is dancing, maybe you should head down to your local disco and see how it's really done. I doubt very much kata could flow as well when put up against techno funk beats. =O


Hi Brodius,

The intent and purpose of kata is often misunderstood. Its a tool similar to kumite, it is not some sort of secret weapon that allows you to take on multiple assailants. Good luck with your training.

regards,
Boz
Willsc
As far as I’m concerned, KATA is the “Art” in Martial Art. If you don’t want to do kata or learn them, there are other styles to do. Boxing can be great for self-defence, and it’s a skill that you can learn. However, boxing could never be an art. I agree that there needs to be an understanding of what we do in a kata, but that can be a personal interpretation. That understanding comes from learning; teaching can only give you some points to focus on. I strongly believe that kata should be in integral part of grading. While performing kata, you can show that you can perform techniques while moving around, that you can balance yourself, that you have timing, etc. I can’t think of any better way to show of the skills that you learned. I don’t believe that you can apply a kata to a real situation, only portions of it in a given situation. Just try to make up a kata by combining elements of other katas. Try doing First Kata, stepping to the right at the first move, or mirror a kata. I for my part enjoy kata and hope that one day I will be satisfied and pleased how I perform. :thumbwink:
Boz
Karate needs to be practised as an art that involves the mind, the body and the human spirit (one's humanity). If a thing is worth doing it is worth doing properly. Kata as a dance belittles its value IMO.

Regards,
Boz
Sionnagh
QUOTE (Willsc @ Jan 7 2004, 01:33 PM)
As far as I’m concerned, KATA is the “Art” in Martial Art.  If you don’t want to do kata or learn them, there are other styles to do.  Boxing can be great for self-defence, and it’s a skill that you can learn.  However, boxing could never be an art.

# Some people would consider boxing an art though wink.gif (OK so I'm nitpicking - not a word fang, brodius  dry.gif )


I agree that there needs to be an understanding of what we do in a kata, but that can be a personal interpretation.  That understanding comes from learning; teaching can only give you some points to focus on. 

# Personal interpretation of kata application can be valid, there's even a name for it.


I strongly believe that kata should be in integral part of grading.  While performing kata, you can show that you can perform techniques while moving around, that you can balance yourself, that you have timing, etc. I can’t think of any better way to show of the skills that you learned. 

# Most schools do require kata demonstration for grading. Some also require bunkai demonstration for grading beyond a certain level.


I don’t believe that you can apply a kata to a real situation, only portions of it in a given situation. 

# The whole kata is not meant to be applied in a real situation. IMO. The sequence you could use would depend on the situation. i.e. response to type of attack.


Just try to make up a kata by combining elements of other katas. 

# When you do a class exercise where YOU have to make up a kata, my recommendation is to do it the opposite way. Instead of cobbling together bits of other kata until you have enough moves for the exercise, instead formulate a number of attack scenarios and play out the responses - this will create the kata for you. Plus you may find it a lot easier to remember when you have to demonstrate your creation.


Try doing First Kata, stepping to the right at the first move, or mirror a kata.  I for my part enjoy kata and hope that one day I will be satisfied and pleased how I perform. :thumbwink:

# Some of the kata are seemingly one-sided. It is a fairly common thought that you ought to practice the mirror-image as well.



wink.gif
Mick
Nooms
Maybe a purpose of learning kata is to give a bit of self confidence as well? Remember when you started karate and the green belts looked cool, doing all these things you were never going to be able to do? And one day you e\realise you CAN do them? I do. When I realised I could actually make my way through first kata and get all the turns the right way round, was when I started to think maybe I could do karate after all. My Saifa is now respectable, although there is always more to do, but knowing my katas can work and flow, gives me some hope for being able to spar one day... not much, but some.

Just a thought.

Bearette
fang
me bias brodious i'm shocked you would think that
Rebecca
Been a while since I've visited here. I feel I've got a bit of an understanding now about what you guys talk about.
I like the focus kata gives me. The feeling I get after putting 100% into a kata and doing what I think is a good job of it is one of the great joys of my martial arts training. Reading this post has made me look at things somewhat differently yet again. Thanks guys for the wonderful concepts, and please keep expanding on them.
Brodius
QUOTE (fang @ Jan 8 2004, 09:40 AM)
me bias brodious i'm shocked you would think that

My apoligies, Fang... sleep.gif
fang
lol but as you know it is true brodious. i really have a deep ingrained dislike no hate of kata
Sionnagh
But why?

wink.gif
Mick
fang
i think it stems back to high school mick, you know the compulsory dance classes i went ass up in the middle of some sort of dance crying.gif, all the girls laughed at me i ran away now i have a deep fear, that turned into a hate of anything that looked remotely like a dance thingy. ok off to the shrink i go maybe all my mental problems stem from this one traumatic incident in my life. time the sue rolleyes.gif
Brodius
You amuse me so much, Fang. =O
fang
glad to hear it brodious. now when i go off about kata does this mean you guys will cut me some slack?.
Matt
Fang I dont believe you for a second. You were always the keen to learn a new kata, and whats more DO IT CORRECTLY - ive seen you spend ages trying to perfect small details. You were doing hangetsu as a blue belt!

Sorry if ive blown your reputation wink.gif
Sionnagh
Hahaha fang has been sprung!

I was chatting with a friend in the UK the other night, comparing some notes and I discovered that I've learnt 9 new kata patterns in the past year, including variations of saifa and bassai dai.

I didn't really mean to, that's the funny part. It's far more than I need to work on, only 4 of them are for training and study.

wink.gif
Mick
Brodius
Hangetsu as a blue belt? O_O I'm so jealous, man. I only knew up to Sanseru back then, and only losely knew the moves too.

Oh yeah, on your site, Mick, there's a random pick of you that makes you look like Steven Seagal. Scary.
Zen Warrior
Hi, for me a kata is a set sequence of moves depicting a stylized fight or defence against multipule attackers. Generally in karate styles they start very basic with long forward stance a block or 2 and punches. Then get progressively more complex with various blocks and strikes as the student learns and masters those techniques.

The kata displays a students ability to move from 1 stance to another with balance and fluidity. Also timing, power, focus and technique of the blocks and strikes. Thus a student learns a couple of basic blocks and strikes plus a simple kata. A couple more blocks and strikes and another kata. And so on.

Ideally each grade should have its own kata that includes those new techniques the student has learnt. Therefore the skill and ability level of the kata must match the actual grade level of the student and vis verser. Does this actually happen in GKR and other styles?

Personally I think siafa is way above orange/green belt level. In its original form it was a black belt kata from the goju styles. Bassai Dia is a brown belt shotokan kata though it is about right for red belt grade.

In conclusion GKR does not have grade appropriate katas to grade to orange, green and blue belts. GKR 2nd kata is too basic to grade to orange belt. It needs to have different basic blocks and strikes to show the students competence of these. Kancho should of used original shotokan and goju katas form their respective kyu grades.


On another topic

A couple of weeks ago I was talking to a black belt instructor in 2 karate and a kung fu styles who also trained in GKR under kancho in the early days. At that time he was a sefu (black belt) kung fu instructor. He did not have any good thinks to say about Kancho except he knows how to make money. Having recently attended a talk and training session with kancho I can understand his opinion. It was like being at an Amway seminar, not suprising since Kancho has been involved in multilevel marketing type businesses in the past.
Boz
QUOTE (Zen Warrior @ Jan 11 2004, 09:44 AM)
Hi,  for me a kata is a set sequence of moves depicting a stylized fight or defence against multipule attackers.  Generally in karate styles they start very basic with long forward stance a block or 2 and punches.  Then get progressively more complex with various blocks and strikes as the student learns and masters those techniques.

Personally I think siafa is way above orange/green belt level.  In its original form it was a black belt kata from the goju styles.  Bassai Dia is a brown belt shotokan kata though it is about right for red belt grade.

Kata are mnemonic devices, each one is a training tool. A stylized fight would not repeat techniques on the left and then the right side. A routine to defend against multiple attackers would not have you repeat techniques as in Saifa. You train both sides in many kata and the opponent is yourself. The kata you mention were being taught to students years before there were any belts, black or otherwise, they were adopted in the 20th century in Japan.

The tradition that once existed saw a basic kata such as Sanchin or Naifanchi practised over a long period of time to build a karate body and instill the fundamentals necessary to progress to a kata that contained methods of self-defense. Pre-Goju schools used to teach Sanchin, and then one or more from Seisan, Sanseru and Suparenpei. Pre-Shotokan groups taught Naifanchi, Bassai, Kanku and Gojushiho. This is a rough guide anyway.

The training consisted more of physical conditioning, two person drills and striking the makiwara. They learned to fight in this manner, the kata provided some tatics and techniques that were extrapolated and used in pairs. Too much time is wasted today on learning too many kata, training for performance of too many kata and not enough teaching available in how to apply the techniques of karate and those within kata. That's my opinion.. the mere performance of endless kata will not prepare to fight one assailant, let alone several.

Regards,
Boz
Sionnagh
QUOTE (Brodius @ Jan 10 2004, 04:59 PM)
Oh yeah, on your site, Mick, there's a random pick of you that makes you look like Steven Seagal. Scary.

And you can see all the mistakes in it too crying.gif
Sionnagh
Is it that a lack of depth of knowledge to teach kata brings about a substitution by having a number of kata to keep students' interest?

Or is it a modern philosophy of 'more is better' ie more students, more dojo, more kata... comparing sizes to see whose is bigger?

wink.gif
Mick
Boz
QUOTE (Sionnagh @ Jan 11 2004, 02:18 PM)
Q 1- Is it that a lack of depth of knowledge to teach kata brings about a substitution by having a number of kata to keep students' interest?

Q 2- Or is it a modern philosophy of 'more is better' ie more students, more dojo, more kata... comparing sizes to see whose is bigger?

wink.gif
Mick

Hi Mick,

Q1- I think so. When you hear about "hito kata sannen' (one kata three years), you have to consider what is there contained in a kata that would take 3 years of study!

Most people can pick memorize the pattern of a kata in the one training session. It may take a few weeks to develop a reasonable performance but that won't actually improve your ability to defend yourself I don't think.

Instructors these days teach a routine for a grading and then start on another. Its like a roundabout that never stops but if you apply the brakes for a minute and think about what you are paying for.. to learn dance routines or to hopefully defend yourself!

Q2- I think there is a bit of this as well. More kata, more students, more competitors, more money when in karate at least, less can be more in regard to Kata. Understand a few really well and there is no need to know a large number. To know how to perform a lot of kata but to understand none seems a little futile!
Regards,
Boz
deano
So does one ever master a kata?
If I was to practice saifa every day under good instruction I dare say after a (long) period of time I would get it pretty good. Would the continued practice of this kata gain any benefits to me? Could it even be counterproductive?
Boz
QUOTE (deano @ Jan 11 2004, 04:18 PM)
So does one ever master a kata?
If I was to practice saifa every day under good instruction I dare say after a (long) period of time I would get it pretty good.  Would the continued practice of this kata gain any benefits to me?  Could it even be counterproductive?

Hi Deano,

Mastery in performance? What is the desired outcome?
Win a competition, pass a grading or just a personal goal?
Could your training time be better spent?

Regards,
Boz
deano
QUOTE (Boz @ Jan 11 2004, 06:49 PM)
QUOTE (deano @ Jan 11 2004, 04:18 PM)
So does one ever master a kata?
If I was to practice saifa every day under good instruction I dare say after a (long) period of time I would get it pretty good.  Would the continued practice of this kata gain any benefits to me?  Could it even be counterproductive?

Hi Deano,

Mastery in performance? What is the desired outcome?
Win a competition, pass a grading or just a personal goal?
Could your training time be better spent?

Regards,
Boz

Dang - more questions wink.gif
Good ones too.
What IS the desired outcome? I get great satisfaction doing a good kata. I dont compete so there's no incentive there; gradings I believe will happen on the strength of a lot of things other than kata, and if mastery of a kata was grading criteria we'd all still be white belts.

So back to my question. My (theoretical) style has one kata. I study my style for four years intensely, each grading my kata is judged more harshly. My mastery of this kata would be pretty good given there arent any others to spend time on.
Is this more beneficial than getting a not half bad understanding of say eight different katas? Some would say more katas is less narrow mindedness due to more exposure to techniques.

I studied Taekwondo in the past and katas were viewed differently. Each belt had a kata and each kata was an extension of the one before, very symmetrical (so as to demonstrate that techniques could correctly be performed each side) and more importantly in my view encompassed the basic techniques that were applicable to that belts grade. Each belt had specific techniques to be assessed, and these were the fundamental techniques in that grades kata. Does this make it any more correct? Of course not, but I think its not a bad way of looking at things
Boz
Hi Deano,

A famous Okinawan expert named Choko Motobu is famous for his indepth knowledge of one kata- Naifanchi Shodan. He knew other kata but he had over 100 challenge matches and was never once hit in the face. He used this kata as a tool to teach his fighting system and his performance of the kata is never mentioned.

At the other end of the spectrum, Mabuni Kenwa was a great collector of kata and retained nearly 60 in his syllabus to preserve them for future generations. On Okinawa though, Mabuni is not considered an expert although his kata performance was very good.

Your hypothetical situation still appears to me to be about performance and there is nothing wrong with that in regard to the current emphasis on rank promotion and competition purposes. However if one's interest truly lies in studying the art of karate then its history, philosophy and application need to be considered.

The old way of learning kata, i.e. one kata three years, is not suitable for today. Still though a real study of one kata for around 6 months before learning a few more would see better rounded karateka produced IMO. One kata per grade at 3-4 month intervals only really allows for performance training and I guess there is still the problem of finding an instructor that actually understands kata.

So much is missed when kata is not analyzed (bunkai) and sythenized (sogo) in the learning process. When this process is instilled then each new kata becomes easier to understand and to extract useful techniques from for one's own personal self-defense needs.

Regards,
Boz
deano
Ah - I think I'm beginning to get it.
I'm still trying to get my head around the whole application of kata concept. As I said my last style used kata as more a test of basics so this is pretty new to me. I'm beginning to see theres more to it now. Still dont get the self defence side of it, but you guys have been doing this longer than me so maybe I'll get it in time wink.gif

Do you think that more katas is a result of styles becoming overly westernized? If your theory about adding more kata to keep the punters keen holds water it implies us white fellas just dont have the discipline to train that the founders of karate would have demanded.
Sionnagh
Well I think not everyone in Japan trains in MA either. And not everyone who does is good. They're just people too, regardless where any particular system may have originated.

If you think that only a small number of students sought out masters to learn, and often had to endure some sort of ordeal before they would be taught - whether it was sitting on the front step for months or becoming a virtual slave - then perhaps the more kata to keep punters keen is for the money-making side of it? Otherwise you would have only a handful of students seeking instruction, would you not?

But you could practice 1 kata every day for months, and unless you have the foundations to analyse it, or as Boz says a teacher who understands and can guide you, you'll just be practicing the pattern and perhaps inventing fanciful things to explain what you're doing.

You do need a starting point to allow you to examine a kata. IMO. Such as, what is a likely attack...

wink.gif
Mick
Zen Warrior
Hi, doing web searches on kata, karate, then specific styles produces dozens of articles detailing the history, development, training methods and applications for kata. What luckly people we are today. [edit. nothing like this was available in the early 1970's] It has been the western influence on martial arts that has resulted in much of the written records being translated and made available. Also much of the oral records of old masters being written down before they died and their successors died.

The vast majority of katas from shotokan, goju, wado ryu and shinto ryu were used for training students before belt gradings were introduced. By the mid 1950's mordern karate had been organisted into the various style organisations with belt grading systems and competitions. Just as judo had been taken from ju jitsu and developed for mass availability, use and acceptance. [thats a very simplified account.]

How does one retain the knowledge of moves, stances, techniques etc of a style. Instead of lots of pages of drawings and notes, [which could be stolen or get you arrested for violating some feudal law] they were put into kata.


Question. Are we looking for things in kata that are not there, were never intended to be there?

Q. Why do gymnasts endlessly practice and perform floor routines?

Q. Why don't we teach children to swim in 2 metre ocean waves?

Blindly following tradition stop improvements, ignore tradition and you re-invent a woblely wheel.

One thing kata can not do is teach me how to spell!
Brodius
That is true. Kata cannot teach you how to spell, though it does give the letter I and H in Taigyoku Shodan and Taigyoku Nidan. That spells !"HI"! and !"IH"!
Sionnagh
Some kata also have a 'T' pattern, or a straight line. Why is this? These do not appear in the japanese character set AFAIK.

wink.gif
Mick
Brodius
AFAIK? O_o;;
Sionnagh
AFAIK = As far as I know

wink.gif
Brodius
Yup, you're right. They're not in any of the kana. But the kanji, who knows? I doubt it though.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.