QUOTE (Matt @ Apr 6 2006, 02:14 PM)

Okay I confused myself with even the title...
Was watching Survivor (shaddup... I was bored) tuesday and they showed a contestant doing Naifanchi Shodan while he was stuck by himself. It was performed vastly differently to the way we do it, with staccato, snappy, abrupt movements as opposed to a "bit more flow" for want of a better expression. This got me thinking - does practicing the kata in such different ways affect the application? Is kata actually practicing application or simply a "human book" to remind us what they are? If so (to echo an old post here) should one customise kata to benefit their own physique?
I found myself thinking much the same things last night after watching a performance of shisochin. I foolishly mentioned this to someone else online and we spent the next 5 hours or so watching kata videos. If kata is a set of exercises designed to teach applications, then should it really matter how it is actually performed? Whether move "X" is a grappling technique, a throw, a block, a strike or a way to disguise a fart in a lift - why does it matter? There are any number of ways to interpret the purpose of the technique, depending on your flavour of art, and regardless of performance, these applications are still there.
Ah, it is too easy to get side tracked and turn this into a post of a thousand questions and ramblings.
Why does the visual performance of a kata matter (grading aside)?
Is THIS why it takes 5 years to learn a kata? Cos the actual performance should be open to personal interpretation of the applications that fit the student?